Amd ryzen 7 3700x vs core i7

If you have been following our misadventures in the world of comparisons, you will have seen that we have faced several top processors. Today it is the turn of these two high-performance components, one of which is widely used for the gaming world. If you want to see which processor suits you best, stay and see the Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i7-9700k .

These two processors are what we could call the line between gaming and content creation. Both processors have good multi-core performance compared to their younger siblings, and very good single-core performance. The latter is very important, since it allows them to be the standard bearers of gaming.

Fortunately or unfortunately, video games are a field that we do not know very well and most do not take advantage of the multi-core potential. For this reason, the most powerful and most threaded processors are not always the ones with the best frames per second.

That said, let's get down to business and start with the Intel Core i7-9700k, as it's the one we haven't yet compared to any.

Index of contents

Intel Core i7-9700k

The Core i7-9700k is the processor that, historically, has positioned itself as the best for gaming, while being the cheapest.

Despite the slightly better i9-9900k , the advantage is small and the price is starting to rise dramatically. On the other hand, the i5-9600k is cheaper, but we also sacrifice some performance.

Since Intel released the Core i9 line with great results in multi-core, the i7 has gone into the background, thus becoming the luxury range for gaming. However, due to its specifications, users have managed to give them a place in the market.

Here are the main features of the processor:

• Architecture: Coffee Lake Socket Compatible: LGA1151 Heatsink: No Integrated Graphics: Yes (Intel® UHD Graphics 630) Number of CPU Cores: 8 Number of Threads: 8 Base Clock Rate: 3.6 GHz Boost Clock Rate: 4.9 GHz Cache Total L2: 256 kB Total L3 Cache: 12 MB Transistor Size: 14nm Recommended RAM Frequency: DDR4-2666 Default TDP / TDP: 95W Approximate price: € 390

As you can see, it is a classic Intel processor . It has high base and boost frequencies, "large" size transistors and in this iteration we lack hyper-threading . Certainly, with all the problems the brand is having with multi-threading, we wouldn't take its inclusion as good news either.

It should also be mentioned that it has a considerably generous cache memory. Unfortunately, all this is under a fairly high estimated consumption.

Finally, it must be emphasized that the price of this component is around € 380-400, which is not turkey mucus. Despite its good video game performance, there is a new processor in town. Will the Core i7-9700k be able to repel it or will the sheriff's badge be removed?

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is the subject to discuss. It is one of the best processors that Ryzen 3000 offers us and has some pretty amazing features. Mount the Zen 2 micro-architecture and its socket will be AM4 , so you probably won't need to upgrade your motherboard if you already had a Ryzen .

It stands out for its performance in single-core, making it a very good processor for gaming if you don't want to spend excessive money.

Also, as expected, it will have 8 cores and 16 threads and its frequencies are not far behind the Intel Core. As a point to note, it has considerably more cache memory, which, according to the company, offers better performance in video games.

If you want to know more about its characteristics, here you can know them:

• Architecture: Zen 2 Compatible Socket: AM4 Heatsink: Yes (Wraith Prism with RGB LED) Integrated Graphics: No Number of CPU Cores: 8 Number of Threads: 16 Base Clock Rate: 3.6 GHz Boost Clock Rate: 4.4 GHz Cache Total L2: 4MB Total L3 Cache: 32MB Transistor Size: 7nm Recommended RAM Frequency: DDR4-3200 Default TDP / TDP: 65W Approximate Price: € 330

If we did not know that it is a new processor, we could confuse it with a top of the range of the current generation.

Finally, we must highlight that it has support for considerably higher RAM frequencies and that it is estimated that all this uses very little energy. According to AMD , the Ryzen 7 3700X will only have 65W of TDP , although that remains to be seen.

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i7-9700k

In gross numbers we have to say that the Ryzen 7 3700X has quite an advantage over the Intel processor and it is not surprising. Between them they take a little more than half a year away, time that AMD has used to prepare and install a better architecture and better technologies.

First of all, it stands out that the Ryzen has two threads per core, which the Intel does not. To mitigate that, Intel solves it with higher frequencies and, in principle, a more polished and efficient architecture.

On the other hand, the Ryzen also has a greater amount of cache memory. It should be noted that both companies treat memory in different ways, so this is not the conclusion that one is better than the other.

Finally, talk about the architecture that the applicant presents, Zen 2, which is made up of transistors of only 7nm . With this size, more transistors can be packed in less space and more power with less energy, which is why the TDP is estimated to be only 65W. Furthermore, this architecture supports higher RAM frequencies, which will give us more stability with more powerful components.

Both processors support unique technologies from their respective companies, so we cannot compare them in many other ways.

To find out more about which one takes advantage of which, let's look at synthetic tests to check their performance.

Synthetic Benchmarks: Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i7-9700k

In the synthetic benchmarks we see a little what we have been collecting in the news.

The new AMD processors are much closer to the Intel in terms of single-core performance and well above multi-core. This gives them a good capacity for gaming and a more than excellent ability for programs that use multi-core, for example, content creation.

In the first tests of AIDA64, the Ryzen manages to get better grades in terms of data transfer. The difference is minimal, but noticeable.

On the other hand, in terms of latency we have from when we request data until we get it, the Core i7 works much better. Here we see that difference that we mentioned that each architecture treats cache memory differently.

As for tests, in the VR and the Intel Core is postulated as head of the duo, however, we have to announce that it is the only test where he puts himself as the leader. Here the difference is quite remarkable, but in the following tests the thing changes.

In these four tests that continue, we see how the AMD processor draws muscle and shows its great potential. In most of them it takes a clear and undeniable advantage to the Intel processor.

The data variation is between just a 5% advantage in PCMark 8 , up to an abysmal difference of more than 30% of time in Blender .

At Cinebench we have the data we would expect. The Intel Core i7-9700k leads the way with 211 points, but the Ryzen 7 3700X is on its heels. On the other hand, when we talk about multi-core performance, Intel doesn't have much to do, since the results of the Ryzen 7 3700X are more than 40% better.

However, with this data in mind, let's see how these processors behave when we put them to gaming tests.

Unfortunately, we have not been able to accumulate data from both components with the same workbench, so we will be citing the benchmarks of Jarrod's Tech's YouTube channel. If you are interested in learning more about the performance of this and other components, we highly recommend its content.

Benchmark Gaming (fps): Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i7-9700k

The range of video games with which these two processors have been tested is broader and they have undergone different video qualities and resolutions.

The work bench with which it has been tested has been:

• Hard Drive: Silicon Power 1TB NVMe M.2 SSD Motherboard: MSI MEG Z390 ACE Motherboard (Intel Core i7-9700k) Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE Motherboard (Ryzen 7 3700X) RAM Memory: G.Skill Flare X Memory DDR4- 3200 Graphics Card: Gigabyte Aorus RTX 2080 Ti Case : NZXT H700 Liquid Cooling: Fractal S36 AIO Power Supply: Corsair HX850i

It should be mentioned that this last test on Battlefield 5 has been done in story mode to avoid too many variables such as servers, number of players and more.

As you can see, in general and against all odds, the Intel Core i7-9700k remains the leader. If we only took into account the number of frames they can process, we would already have a winner. However, we have to give credit to AMD , since it is positioned, on average, just a few frames behind its competition. The oscillation of frames is around 5% and 20% depending on the game.

We can also see how as we raise the resolution, the advantage of the blue team is decreasing. In part it is normal, since it is more difficult to maintain high fps rates, but it also has to do with the performance of the processors.

Although, how good are these processors when it comes to consumption and cooling?

Consumption and Temperatures

Consumption in both processors are, at best, quite different.

Despite both spending similar power at rest, when we put the processors under load, the Ryzen takes much higher values. Perhaps for its high number of cores and threads or for other purposes. We sincerely hoped that, due to the new micro-architecture, the processor would achieve much more discrete values.

On the other hand, the temperatures we have obtained are much better. Both pieces are kept at around 35ºC when it is at rest, but when we subject it to workload, things change. Here it is the Intel processor that takes higher values, while the Ryzen stays low around 45ºC.

For these tests we have used the stock cooling solution, that is, the AMD Wraith Prism RGB , so the results are quite positive.

What is the best gaming processor?

The answer to this question is quite obvious, since the Intel Core i7-9700k is much superior in terms of games. However, this only happens if we consider the fps that we can obtain.

If we consider other sections, the conclusion is more difficult to obtain. For example, the Ryzen 7 3700X is a cheaper processor and also performs better for other tasks like streaming or 3D modeling and more.

Taking all this into account, the most obvious answer between these two processors is to choose the Ryzen . For a lower price, we have a few frames less, but much more potential. Above all, it becomes a better choice if you do not just play and also stream, use editing programs and other things.

We recommend reading the best processors on the market

On the other hand, we also have more advanced technologies and better specifications in general, making it a better bet for the future. If at any time you think about improving your equipment, you can do it with components compatible with PCIe Gen 4 , which will greatly improve transfer speeds.

And you, what do you think about these two processors? Which of the two would you buy and why? Share your ideas in the comment box below.

Jarrods's Tech Font