Comparison amd ryzen 2700x vs 2600x in games and applications
Table of contents:
- AMD Ryzen 2700X vs 2600X technical characteristics
- AMD Ryzen 2700X vs 2600X gaming performance
- AMD Ryzen 2700X vs 2600X app performance
- Final words and conclusion about AMD Ryzen 2700X vs 2600X
We continue with our interesting comparisons starring the new second-generation Ryzen processors, on this occasion, we bring you the confrontation between the Ryzen 7 2700X and the Ryzen 5 2600X, two models based on the same architecture, but with different number of cores so It will be really interesting to see the differences between the two in very demanding games and applications. Without further delay we start our comparison AMD Ryzen 2700X vs 2600X in games and applications.
AMD Ryzen 2700X vs 2600X technical characteristics
Both processors are based on the same AMD Zen + architecture, so the only differences will be in the number of cores, and the operating frequencies that both processors are capable of achieving. In the case of the Ryzen 5 2600X, we have a silicon consisting of six cores and twelve processing threads at a base frequency of 3.6 GHz, which can reach 4.2 GHz thanks to XFR 2.0 and Precision Boost 2 technologies.
We recommend reading our post about AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 1800X: comparative in games and applications
Its big brother, the Ryzen 7 2700X, is a sixteen-core, eight-core processor at a base frequency of 3.7 GHz. This processor is capable of 4.3 GHz thanks to XFR 2.0 and Precision Boost 2, making it the fastest and most powerful processor manufactured by AMD. Essentially, we have the Ryzen 5 2600X to be a slightly cropped version of the Ryzen 7 2700X.
AMD Ryzen 2700X vs 2600X gaming performance
Having seen the characteristics of both processors, we turn to see their performance in today's most demanding games. As always, we have used 1080p, 2K and 4K resolutions to have the most objective view possible of what these processors are capable of offering.
TESTING GAMES 1080P (GeForce GTX 1080Ti) |
|||||
Rise of Tomb Raider | Far Cry 5 | DOOM 4 | Final Fantasy XV | DEUS EX: Mankind | |
Ryzen 7 2700X | 155 | 106 | 137 | 125 | 112 |
Ryzen 5 2600X | 146 | 106 | 115 | 126 | 112 |
GAMES TESTS - 2K - 1440P (GeForce GTX 1080Ti) |
|||||
Rise of Tomb Raider | Far Cry 5 | DOOM 4 | Final Fantasy XV | DEUS EX: Mankind | |
Ryzen 7 2700X | 129 | 97 | 127 | 95 | 87 |
Ryzen 5 2600X | 129 | 87 | 111 | 97 | 87 |
GAME TESTING - 4K - 2160P (GeForce GTX 1080Ti) |
|||||
Rise of Tomb Raider | Far Cry 5 | DOOM 4 | Final Fantasy XV | DEUS EX: Mankind | |
Ryzen 7 2700X | 76 | 56 | 78 | 51 | 48 |
Ryzen 5 2600X | 77 | 56 | 79 | 53 | 48 |
The results are clear, the Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X processors offer almost the same gaming performance, this is because they both offer spare threads for all games today, and the operating frequencies hardly differ from each other. The few differences that we can see, are due to the fact that the Ryzen 7 2700X works about 100 MHz above its little brother, something that we can fix with a little overclocking, and the impossibility of repeating exactly the same conditions twice.
AMD Ryzen 2700X vs 2600X app performance
TESTING APPLICATIONS |
||||||||
AIDA 64 READING (DDR4 3400) | AIDA 64 WRITING (DDR4 3400) | CINEBENCH R15 | 3D MARK FIRE STRIKE | 3D MARK TIME SPY | VRMARK | PC MARK 8 | LOAD CONSUMPTION (W) | |
Ryzen 7 2700X | 49930 | 47470 | 1764 | 22567 | 8402 | 9810 | 4186 | 199 |
Ryzen 5 2600X | 50013 | 47542 | 1362 | 18374 | 6239 | 9842 | 3965 | 175 |
We go to see the performance in demanding applications with the processor and the matter has changed a lot. Under these conditions, the Ryzen 7 2700X can take advantage of its two cores and four extra threads to position itself above its little brother. These tests are very demanding, and are able to take advantage of all the muscle of modern processors.
Final words and conclusion about AMD Ryzen 2700X vs 2600X
It is time to do a final analysis of AMD Ryzen 2700X vs 2600X, if you are going to use your PC mainly to play, the Ryzen 7 2600X is the best option, since it offers us a performance almost identical to that of its older brother and is almost 100 euros cheaper, a design that we can invest in another component such as a higher capacity SSD, or a more powerful graphics card. Those almost 100 euros can be the difference between a GTX 1070 and a GTX 1080, which will have an infinitely greater impact on the final performance of the team. With this we can say that the Ryzen 5 2600X is the most interesting AMD processor for gamers.
On the other side of the ring, we have users who are going to use their PC with very demanding applications such as high-quality video editing, in this case, the extra muscle of the Ryzen 7 2700X will be taken advantage of, so it is clearly a better investment for these users. We're talking about the most powerful AMD-made processor to date, a processor that is superior even to the Core i7 8700K in these CPU-demanding applications.
Here ends our comparison AMD Ryzen 2700x vs 2600x in games and applications, remember to share the post on social networks so that it can help more users.
Amd ryzen 7 2700x vs ryzen 7 1800x: comparative games and applications
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 1800X, we compared the two top-of-the-range models of the latest AMD processor generations to see the differences.
Amd ryzen 5 2600x vs core i7 8700k in games and applications
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X VS Core i7 8700K. We analyzed the performance of both processors in demanding games and applications to see the differences.
Amd ryzen 5 2600x vs ryzen 7 1800x performance games and applications
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs Ryzen 7 1800X in games and applications. We compare the two AMD processors to see which one is the most interesting.