Firefox quantum vs google chrome which is faster?
Table of contents:
- Firefox Quantum vs Google Chrome speed comparison
- Boot time and memory consumption
- Final words and conclusion Firefox Quantum vs Google Chrome
With the arrival of a new web browser it is always said to be the fastest and the best on the market. It was no different with the arrival of Firefox Quantum, the new Mozilla browser that promises to offer a much higher experience than that offered by its rivals. Firefox Quantum vs Google Chrome.
Firefox Quantum vs Google Chrome speed comparison
Firefox went a long time without a major overhaul, causing it to be a noticeably slower browser than Chrome, yet it was still an excellent choice. To make the comparison Firefox Quantum vs. Google Chrome, a Dell XPS 13 computer with a 2.5 GHz Core i7-7660U processor was used together with 16 GB of RAM.
Firstly, WebXPRT 2015 has been used, which consists of six tests based on HTML5 and JavaScript, so it will give us a good insight into the speed of both browsers. Firefox Quantum has achieved a result of 491 points compared to 460 points for Google Chrome, so, indeed, it seems to be the fastest. Firefox has excelled in Organize Album and Explore DNA Sequencing tests, while Chrome has won in Photo Enhancement and Local Notes, so both browsers have different strengths.
We now turn to JetStream 1.1, a test that focuses on JavaScript and includes a dozen tests to analyze the speed of the browser as well as its latency. Firefox Quantum also prevails here with 183.1 points compared to Chrome's 178.4.
The latest Firefox Quantum vs Google Chrome speed test is Octane 2.0, in whose development Google has participated so it should be highly optimized for Chrome. This test runs 21 different JavaScript-based tests and summarizes the results into a single score. Google Chrome wins this time with 35, 662 points compared to Firefox's 35, 148 points.
Boot time and memory consumption
We now turn to see the start time of both browsers, for this, PassMark AppTimer has been used when opening and closing 50 windows of each of the browsers. Firefox has also imposed itself here with a result of 0.287 seconds, just below Chrome's 0.302 seconds.
The next test is to measure the memory consumption of both browsers. One problem with today's browsers is that they consume a large amount of RAM due to the complexity of today's websites. This causes some more modest computers to suffer from having multiple tabs or windows open.
10 popular websites including Tom's Guide and Laptop have been opened for the test; CNN and ESPN; Facebook and Twitter among others. All of them have been opened in a single window so each site was in a tab. To measure memory usage, the Windows task manager has been used after 5 minutes with all tabs open.
The results have been very adjusted with Chrome consuming marginally less RAM as soon as you open the browser with 126.3 MB compared to Firefox's 145.3 MB. Once all tabs are open Chrome has consumed 1, 362.4MB compared to 1, 400.5MB for Firefox. The biggest difference has been that Firefox has used 6 processes while Chrome has used 14 processes. The situation changes when opening 30 tabs, with Chrome consuming 4, 151.3MB compared to 3, 883MB in Firefox.
Final words and conclusion Firefox Quantum vs Google Chrome
Firefox Quantum comes demonstrating the spirit of Mozilla, the new browser has been very fast and has also shown that it is more efficient with the use of RAM when you have a large number of tabs open. What is clear is that both browsers are very fast and behave equally well, since the differences are marginal and in some cases one will win and in others the other will win.
Our final conclusion is that the differences are too small to give one of the two browsers the winner of the comparison Firefox Quantum vs Google Chrome. Either one is a great choice, just use the one you like best.
New version opera 51 is 38% faster than firefox quantum
Opera 51 is now available for download, this new version has focused on improving browsing speed to be faster than the new Firefox.
Whatsapp predicts which photos we will send and thus upload them faster
WhatsApp predicts which photos we are going to send and thus upload them faster. Find out more about the new feature that is already in the messaging application.
1.1.1.1 Vs 8.8.8.8 cloudflare or google which is faster?
Comparison between Cloudflare and Google DNS services between 1.1.1.1 vs. 8.8.8.8 which will be faster? Pros and cons of these DNS