Gtx 1650 vs rx 470: confrontation between the new and the old

GTX 1650 vs RX 470. The battle for entry range

There are players in all price ranges, from enthusiasts who love to modify and have the most powerful equipment, to those who fight for stable frames in their favorite games.

Here we will take a look at the latter, those great fighters who optimize every drop of performance of their team. For this, we have here two great rivals of the low-end graphics card range, the Nvidia GTX 1650 vs AMD RX 470.

specs

We have a lot of data from both companies, however the technologies differ. So much so that both components, despite performing the same task, use different magnitudes to measure the muscle of the graphs.

First, we will show you some important points that both competitors share:

	GTX 1650	RX 470
Departure date	2019	2016
Approximate price	160 €	€ 130
Units of computation	14	32
Clock frequency	1485 MHz	926MHz
Overclocked frequency	1665 MHz	1230MHz
Dedicated RAM memory	4 GB DDR5	4GB DDR5
Data bus	128 Bits	256 bits
Bandwidth	128 GB / s	211 GB / s
Average noise	45 dB	49dB
Average energy consumed	75W	120W

performance

If we talk about performance, the matter is quite disputed. In some respects like compute units or AMD bandwidth breaks it. However, Nvidia recovers ground at clock frequencies or average power consumed.

As it happens in other comparisons of these two great ones, Nvidia has a greater efficiency, whereas AMD has more gross power. However, it must be emphasized that the green team card is much more recent, which is why the efficiency of one over the other stands out even more.

Overall, we see the results we would expect when comparing graphs from the past against less experienced, but much more battle-ready.

As for empirical results, we cannot ask for much more. The frames we reach are very even in most video games.

Benchmarks

The benchmarks have been performed by user NJ Tech . If you want to see more data on these and other graphics cards, you can follow their work from here.

Conclusions about GTX 1650

As we have seen in the data presented, things are very level. Both graphics perform excellently at 1080p @ 60 and grow well when overclocked, which is why neither takes a permanent advantage.

However, in this case, the results are not only the images that we are able to print per second, but other characteristics also come into play.

Since the Nvidia is newer , it supports more technologies and, in addition, it also has an architecture more adapted to current times. On the other hand, the energy consumed is less with one graph than with another, which has weighed heavily on the resolution.

Despite the somewhat higher price, if we only took into account these two graphics we would recommend buying the Nvidia GTX 1650 for the other things that make this graphic a good choice. In general, in technology it is better to choose a newer product than an older one for the same performance, it is something that is often seen in the world of telephony.

WE RECOMMEND YOU SK Hynix will start mass production of its GDDR6 in three months

What do you think of Nvidia and AMD ? Do you think the input graphs are very popular? Share your ideas below.

NJ TechUserbenchmark Font