Processors

Intel would be doing a 'downgrade' at 10nm to make them viable

Table of contents:

Anonim

Intel's 10nm process was designed to be ambitious, providing Intel with area reductions of over 50% compared to its current 14nm manufacturing node. The 10nm was initially scheduled for launch in 2015, but the process was fraught with problems throughout its development, to the point that products with this node are expected to hit the market only in late 2019.

The 10nm node is a headache for Intel

Traditionally, Intel released two architectures at each process node, creating the well-known "Tick Tock" release cycle. The 14nm broke this cycle, with Broadwell, Skylake, Kaby Lake and Coffee Lake releasing the process. Now Coffee Lake-S processors are expected to add to this 14nm product list, showing how difficult it is for Intel to make the leap to a more advanced manufacturing process with fewer nanometers.

The only processors Intel made at 10nm were exclusive Cannon Lake for a small range of Chinese notebooks.

Semi Accurate claims Intel is sacrificing 10nm node characteristics

According to Semi Accurate sources, Intel is downgrading its 10nm process to get production ready as soon as possible, sacrificing some of its space / area savings on the matrix. The goal is that they can improve their manufacturing yields enough to make 10nm financially viable. In fact, Semi Accurate goes on to say that Intel's new 10nm will be "effectively a 12nm process, " although this is something Intel would never publicly admit.

Intel appears to have been overly ambitious with 10nm, creating a manufacturing node that has proven too difficult to produce, forcing the company to lower its space-saving targets to make the process suitable for large-scale processor manufacturing. scale.

Regardless of how you look at it, the 10nm is one of Intel's biggest failures in a long time, causing it to lose market share in the server sector next year, where AMD will have its EPYC chips with a node ready. 7 nm.

Overclock3D font

Processors

Editor's choice

Back to top button