Processors

New benchmark of amd ryzen points to a higher ipc than kaby lake

Table of contents:

Anonim

AMD Ryzen continues to try to clear all doubts before the arrival of the first official reviews, a new leak suggests that the new AMD Zen microarchitecture has a performance per clock cycle (IPC) higher than Intel Kaby Lake.

Ryzen shows higher CPI than Kaby Lake

AMD has confirmed in the Ryzen presentation that the Zen microarchitecture offers 52% more IPC than its Excavator core, this figure made us think that it had reached a level similar to Haswell / Broadwell but new data suggests that the IPC of the New Silicon from AMD has managed to catch up or even beat Intel Kaby Lake.

AMD Ryzen 7 1700, Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 7 1800X in presale

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has been brought face to face with the Intel Core i7-7500 in the Userbench single-core test, the AMD processor has achieved a score of 124 points at a speed of 3.8 GHz while the chip of Intel has stayed at 111 points. We see that the Ryzen processor is capable of matching the Intel solution at a lower 400 MHz frequency. This difference would be due to the fact that each of Ryzen's cores has access to 33% more cache memory compared to Kaby Lake (8 MB vs 6 MB), something that will make situations that are highly influenced by this memory AMD's new microarchitecture is superior to Intel.

AMD Ryzen 7 1800X at 5.2 GHz breaks the world record at Cinebench

To put the balance a little more balanced the Ryzen 7 1700X has been put against the Core i7-7700K, both chips have the same amount of cache with 8 MB L3, we see how the new AMD processor is still capable of staying ahead when both are compared at the same 4.5 GHz frequency.

AMD Ryzen is leaving everyone with a very good feeling in the different benchmarks that appear on the new platform, there is no doubt that the new processors will be off-road chips with impressive performance in all scenarios. The big question right now is what will be its performance in video games.

Source: wccftech

Processors

Editor's choice

Back to top button