Amd ryzen 7 4800h: first foreign review leaked

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: first leaked review
specs
Synthetic benchmarks
According to fellow Xiaobai PCs, the reason would be that, in the R20 benchmark, the key is sequential or continuous frequency . The Intel has much higher frequency spikes than the AMD chip, but the AMD tests at about 3.68 GHz on average ; the i9 does it at 3.4 GHz or 3.5 GHz .
Finally, the AIDA64 benchmark was a failure for the Ryzen 7 4800H because it was less performing than an i7-1065G7 . Similarly, the results are not as bad as you think.
Benchmarks in video games
Conclusions

Attention! We have received the first review of the highly anticipated laptop processor: the Ryzen 7 4800H. It will surely surprise you.

The notebook sector is going to be more moved than Intel thinks, proof of this is this review of the Ryzen 7 4800H. This chip is focused on the high performance range, so it stands out for its great power. However, the Ryzen 4000 have a 7nm lithograph, an aspect that works in its favor. Next, we show you all the review about this team.

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: first leaked review

We would like to tell you that it is we who do the review, but the Chinese are the first in everything. Similarly, we thank you for offering this first-hand information to the people of PC Xiaobai . Apparently, they had a team powered by the Ryzen 7 4800H, so they took the opportunity to do a detailed review.

specs

In this case, the laptop in question is the ASUS FA506IU-AL019T, whose specifications are as follows:

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H. Screen 15.6 ″ Full HD IPS 144Hz Screen.16GB DDR4 RAM 3200 MHz.1TB M.2 NVMe SSD.NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660Ti 6GB.

As many of you know, the Ryzen 4000 range follows the 7nm Zen 2 architecture. In the case of the Ryzen 7 4800H it is a chip with 8 cores and 16 threads; In other words, 2 CCXs containing 4 cores. Its L3 cache is 8MB, while the L2 cache is 4MB. Therefore, we have a technical sheet very similar to the one we see in desktop processors.

Its base frequency is 2.9 GHz, but the turbo is 4.2 GHz, but this Ryzen is not that it has a certain maximum frequency. Many of you care about its consumption, so we will tell you that its nominal TDP is 45 W, but its limit is 65 W. As for its RAM, the examined computer supports up to DDR4 3200 MHz.

Synthetic benchmarks

According to fellow Xiaobai PCs , the reason would be that, in the R20 benchmark, the key is sequential or continuous frequency. The Intel has much higher frequency spikes than the AMD chip, but the AMD tests at about 3.68 GHz on average; the i9 does it at 3.4 GHz or 3.5 GHz.

Finally, the AIDA64 benchmark was a failure for the Ryzen 7 4800H because it was less performing than an i7-1065G7. Similarly, the results are not as bad as you think.

Benchmarks in video games

It is the turn of gaming performance for this ASUS FA506IU. Before starting with them, the Chinese media decided to test the performance in Adobe Photoshop. To do this, they compared the performance between two Lenovo Legion (Y9000) and two Macbook Pro: the 13 and the 16.

The winner of the test was the Macbook Pro 1 6, which is powered by the i9-9980H. The second was the Ryzen 7 4800H, leaving behind the i5 and i7-9750H of the other teams.

They wanted to compare performance in Adobe Premiere, another of the most demanding tools. Here the AMD remade and won the test on the MacBook Pro 16 itself.

Without further ado, the first video game is the Metro Exodus. The settings were as follows:

Resolution: 1080p.DirectX 12.Quality: Ultra.Texture filter: AF 16X.Motion Blur: normal.Tiling: full.PhyX advanced: yes.Ray tracing: no.DLSS: no.Shadin Rate: 100.

The AMD chip got 62.65 FPS maximum, but the realistic figure is 38.80 FPS.

WE RECOMMEND YOU GIGABYTE presents the X399 AORUS Gaming 7 motherboard

Testing continued with Assasin's Creed, Metro, and Total War. Results were compared to Lenovo Legion Y7000 equipped with i7-9750H. The FPS shown is the maximum and the setting was " Ultra ". The results are not very encouraging, knowing that the i7-9750H is a chip from last year. After all, Intel's strength is its single / dual-core efficiency.

The only argument in favor is that, in tests, the Ryzen proved to consume less than its rival, but who cares about that in gaming laptops? I think it is okay to reduce consumption, but here the user values performance more for every € / $ invested.

In conclusion, the Ryzen 7 4800H has shown a great improvement in this review, being more powerful in single-core. However, this chip is limited to the power consumption and cooling of the computer, as it is a hot processor.

Conclusions

In synthetic tests the Ryzen 7 4800H demonstrates outstanding performance for its power consumption. You can rub elbows with the Intel i9, when these are not your target, but the Intel Core i7. In gaming, Intel is still the queen, demonstrating several more fps on CPUs from the previous generation. This does not mean that the 4800H is bad, but that it is not the best in gaming.

It has become clear that, in applications that take advantage of CPU threads and cores, Ryzen wins or gives excellent performance. However, if you want a laptop to play video games and get the best experience, these results do not suggest Ryzen 4000. More than anything because there is still to know the 10th generation Intel for laptops.

In conclusion, the difference will be made by the price of Ryzen equipment. If these are reasonably priced against Intel equivalents, we are sure they will be a success. For those curious , the equipment subjected to these tests has a price of around € 1, 299.

Doing a quick poll, the notebooks equipped with i7-9750H, with equivalent features, do not drop below € 1, 199. So this is a good start. This makes us think that the next 10th generation i7 will be much more expensive than the AMD.

We recommend the best laptops on the market

What do you think about the performance obtained? Do you think its gaming performance is disappointing? Did you expect more?

Via reddit Xiaobai PC Source