A 6-core ryzen 3000 appears, faster than the ryzen 2700x
Table of contents:
- A Ryzen 3000 6-core appears in Geekbench, it would be the hypothetical Ryzen 3 3300
- 3000 series (unofficial) table
- Performance compared to Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 2600X
Within hours of the unveiling of the Ryzen 3000 series, unofficial name, we have a leaked benchmark of an alleged 6-core Ryzen under Geekbench 4.
A Ryzen 3000 6-core appears in Geekbench, it would be the hypothetical Ryzen 3 3300
In these hours a peculiar entry in Geekbench was detected. The input carries the same chain that we have seen on all other previous 'Zen 2' Ryzen 3000 series chips that have been leaked. This particular chip is a 6-core, 12-wire piece, and is most likely one of AMD's entry-level Ryzen 3000 range proposals.
We already had the leak of a 16 core and 12 core Ryzen 3000 chip, now we have the leak of a 6 core and 12 wire chip. This specific chip has a base clock speed of 3.2 GHz and a Turbo of 4.0 GHz.
Visit our guide on the best processors on the market
These are exactly the same specifications of the leaked Ryzen 3 3300 CPU a while back. That based on everything we have heard so far, it will be the cheapest variant of the series.
In the following table we see the rumored chips of the new series based on Zen 2, where the Ryzen 3 3300 will be the most modest offer. We can also note that AMD used minimum 6-core chips up for the desktop market.
3000 series (unofficial) table
CPU | CORES / THREADS | Base CLOCK | TURBO | TDP | PRICE | Debut |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ryzen 3 3300 | 6/12 | 3.2GHz | 4.0GHz | 50W | $ 99 | ESC |
Ryzen 3 3300X | 6/12 | 3.5GHz | 4.3GHz | 65W | $ 129 | ESC |
Ryzen 3 3300G | 6/12 | 3.0GHz | 3.8GHz | 65W | $ 129 | Q3 2019 |
Ryzen 5 3600 | 8/16 | 3.6GHz | 4.4GHz | 65W | $ 178 | ESC |
Ryzen 5 3600X | 8/16 | 4.0GHz | 4.8GHz | 95W | $ 229 | ESC |
Ryzen 5 3600G | 8/16 | 3.2GHz | 4.0GHz | 95W | $ 199 | Q3 2019 |
Ryzen 7 3700 | 12/24 | 3.8GHz | 4.6GHz | 95W | $ 299 | ESC |
Ryzen 7 3700X | 12/24 | 4.2GHz | 5.0GHz | 105W | $ 329 | ESC |
Ryzen 9 3800X | 16/32 | TBA | TBA | 125W | $ 449 | ESC |
Ryzen 9 3850X | 16/32 | TBA | TBA | 135W | $ 499 | TBA |
Performance compared to Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 2600X
The most interesting thing about this chip would be its performance. The Ryzen 3 3300 achieved a single core score of 5061 and a multi-core score of 25481. In contrast, a Ryzen 7 2700X scores 4923 and 25209 points respectively. This means that the 3300 with two fewer cores and significantly lower base clock and turbo speeds has managed to outperform AMD's current 8-core flagship AMD.
There is little left to check if all this is true, but it looks very good.
Wccftech fontGoogle chrome 56: reloading a page is now faster than ever
In Chrome 56 this process is significantly improved, being able to reload a web page up to 28% faster than in previous versions.
Why is an ssd faster than a usb?
Why is an SSD faster than a USB? Discover the reasons that make an SSD much faster than a USB. Read everything now.
Ryzen 5 2600 'pinnacle ridge' is 30% faster than ryzen 5 1600
The first Ryzen 'Pinnacle Ridge' processors are beginning to appear in the Geekbench database, where they show off their performance. The first of them is the Ryzen 5 2600, which has been seen along with its performance in single-core and multi-core.