Graphics Cards

Gtx 1660 super vs rtx 2060: performance comparison

Table of contents:

Anonim

Ready for our comparison GTX 1660 SUPER vs RTX 2060 ? As many of you know, the new GTX 1660 SUPER was launched a few days ago and is a more powerful graphics card than the GTX 1660 'vanilla', so powerful that it rivals its older sister, the RTX 2060, although without Ray Tracing options..

Index of contents

GTX 1660 SUPER vs RTX 2060 gaming performance comparison

In this comparison we are going to see how close the GTX 1660 SUPER is compared to the RTX 2060 in 1080p, 1440p and 4K resolutions in some of the most famous games today.

Testing equipment

The equipment used for testing consisted of a Core i9-9900K processor, an Asus Maximus XI Formula motherboard and 16GB of 3600 MHz Trident Z NEO RAM. In addition, all the games were adjusted to their highest quality.

1080p gaming performance

GTX 1660 SUPER RTX 2060
tomb Raider 90 fps 98 fps
Far Cry 5 103 fps 113 fps
DOOM 146 fps 130 fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided 84 fps 100 fps
Final Fantasy XV 92 fps 107 fps
Control 60 fps 67 fps

As we see in this comparison at 1080p resolution, the performance difference between the two is around 10% in most cases, except in DOOM, where the GTX 1660 SUPER manages to outperform its older sister. We also see another curious result in Gears 5, where there is a favorable mark for the SUPER variant of about 4 fps, in the rest, the RTX wins.

1440p

GTX 1660 SUPER RTX 2060
tomb Raider 62 fps 67 fps
Far Cry 5 70 fps 69 fps
DOOM 103 fps 118 fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided 56 fps 68 fps
Final Fantasy XV 62 fps 70 fps
Control 59 fps 65 fps

By increasing the resolution the differences are shortened in terms of frames (as is normal) but an average advantage of 10% or more is maintained for the RTX. Anyway, the SUPER variant manages to match the results with Far Cry 5. It can also be confirmed that both are interesting graphics to play in 1440p resolution, always doing some graphic clipping here and there to keep the 60 fps stable in most games.

4K

GTX 1660 SUPER RTX 2060
tomb Raider 34 fps 38 fps
Far Cry 5 35 fps 42 fps
DOOM 52 fps 60 fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided 29 fps 37 fps
Final Fantasy XV 32 fps 36 fps
Control 56 fps 64 fps

Although neither of the two graphics cards is intended for 4K, the differences don't seem to change much between the two. The Control case is noteworthy, where there are practically no performance differences with the game in 1080p or 4K.

Consumption and temperature of the GTX 1660 SUPER vs RTX 2060 test

Consumption (Rest) Consumption (Load)
GTX 1660 SUPER 56W 249W
RTX 2060 58W 197W

We see a big difference in consumption at full load, where the SUPER model wins comfortably. This difference is more than 50W.

Temperature (Rest) Temperature (Load)
GTX 1660 SUPER 44 ° C 63 ° C
RTX 2060 25 ° C 59 ° C

The temperatures are more or less the same at full load, but not at rest, the SUPER is warmer at rest, much more seeing this comparison, with a difference of almost 20 degrees.

Final words and conclusion

To reach a conclusion between both graphics cards, we must not only take into account their performance, but also the price at which we can buy both models. A GTX 1660 SUPER can be obtained in Spain for prices that vary from 250-300 euros depending on the brand. The RTX 2060 is more expensive and we can get one with a budget between 350 and 400 euros or more. The price difference can be around 100 euros here, which makes the SUPER model more attractive, as it is only 10% (approximately) slower. Although if we apply overclock the thing is equal between both.

We recommend you read the best graphics cards

We must also bear in mind that the RTX option comes with Ray Tracing, but if this does not seem like a weight option to choose it, the SUPER model would win. Either way, this choice will depend on each user, the budget they have and what they are willing to sacrifice.

Graphics Cards

Editor's choice

Back to top button