Amd ryzen 7 3800x beats core i9
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b116/7b116e6bd80afe4a909a13ba5f6e2726672243d8" alt="Amd ryzen 7 3800x beats core i9"
Table of contents:
Geekbench 4 results for the upcoming release of AMD's Ryzen 7 3800X processor have been uncovered, giving us some performance numbers to compare against the Intel Core i9-9900K. These performance results were discovered by TUM_APISAK on Twitter.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X beats Core i9-9900K
Both the Ryzen 7 3800X and i9-9900K are 8-core, 16-thread processors, making them natural rivals. However, that's where the similarities end. The Ryzen 7 3800X has a base clock speed of 3.8 GHz and a boost clock of 4.5 GHz, while the i9-9900K works with a base clock of 3.6 GHz and a boost clock of 5 GHz. On paper, the i9-9900K should have the upper hand, but we know it's not always the case in the hardware world.
An important aspect to note about the Ryzen 7 3800X result is that the test system was using DDR4-2133 memory. Since third-generation Ryzen have been supporting DDR4-3200 memory since launch, slower memory performance will obviously limit chip performance. In order to make a fairer comparison, a result in which the Core i9-9900K is using the same memory speed DDR4-2133 was used as a reference in Geekbench 4.
With this level playing field, it appears that AMD is catching up to Intel in single core performance. However, the Core i9-9900K is still 1.09% faster here, according to leaked figures.
Multi-core results, on the other hand, are in AMD's favor. The Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms the Core i9-9900K by up to 4.95% on multicore workloads.
Visit our guide on the best processors on the market
The Core i9-9900K outperforms the Ryzen 7 3800X when paired with DDR4-2666 memory, Intel's official memory speed. The Core i9-9900K performs approximately 14.48% and 0.56% faster in single-core and multi-core tests, respectively. Basically, what this tells us is that Geekbench 4 is sensitive to memory speeds.
It is too early to declare the Ryzen 7 3800X the winner. We will have to wait for more tests in addition to Geekbench to find out.
Tomshardware fontIntel core i9 7960x beats amd threadripper without messing up
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48e40/48e406f60c7add92c96609ec24dc949932af9dbc" alt="Intel core i9 7960x beats amd threadripper without messing up Intel core i9 7960x beats amd threadripper without messing up"
The Geekbench score of the upcoming Intel Core i9 7960X has been leaked on the network network, showing great performance for this processor.
Listings of amd ryzen 9 3800x, ryzen 3700x, and ryzen 5 3600x surface appear in web stores
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4db2/c4db2e42c377e339585e5348ec0eb3d95879a6ed" alt="Listings of amd ryzen 9 3800x, ryzen 3700x, and ryzen 5 3600x surface appear in web stores Listings of amd ryzen 9 3800x, ryzen 3700x, and ryzen 5 3600x surface appear in web stores"
New AMD Ryzen 9 3800X, Ryzen 3700X and Ryzen 5 3600X Surface CPUs Listed in New Generation Zen 2 Stores in Turkey and Vietnam
A new 12-core ryzen appears that beats the 1920x threadripper
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54e3b/54e3b1fa74018a64163a3139dafd6873ecf40a16" alt="A new 12-core ryzen appears that beats the 1920x threadripper A new 12-core ryzen appears that beats the 1920x threadripper"
The chip seen in the popular database would be an engineering sample of an upcoming 12-core variant of the Ryzen 3000 series.